A Sudden “Awakening”
November 27th, 2006 by Hugh
I received an email from Martin King at the end of last week saying: “only drastic action will save Exbiblio.”
Well that’s one way of getting the company blogger’s attention.
A telephone call this weekend filled out some of the details. Martin tells me that conversations have been taking place, both on an individual and a collective level, in which he has informed Exbiblio’s 17 employees that the company will retrench down to a core of about 5 to 8 full time staff by the end of this week. The consultants, who form a large part of Exbiblio’s cost base, will also be cut back – if not to zero, to something close to that.
The news seems all the more unexpected when you take into account that Exbiblio has hired four new people over the last month. In fact, I was just about to publish a portrait of one of the new arrivals. But if you follow some of the links in this post, you will see that all the warning signs have been there.
Martin described the decision as “a sudden awakening”. The company is burning through its resources “way too quickly”. Week after week has passed when there was supposed to be a fully functioning prototype of the oPen scanner pen in their hands. Each week has been met with disappointment.
As well as these continuing “challenges” there were two immediate causes that precipitated the ‘awakening”. Exbiblio found on November 17th that the price of a key optical component was going to be two and a half times what it had budgeted for. Then, on November 21 came another blow: it found that a critical component, the oLed display wasn’t going to be available, and it would require a major redesign to incorporate another display.
In addition to all this, the software project to accompany with the hardware has been progressing slowly.
Martin now acknowledges he made a fundamental mistake six months ago. He insisted that the project would progress in ‘experimental mode’ discovering what worked as it went along. It didn’t have a full spec- just a sort of general direction.
“That was a terrible mistake”, he admits, “I should have allowed people to develop formal product specification, and let everyone know that it would change as we went on. People don’t like working in environments of uncertainty. Formal disciplines are necessary.”
On my last visit to Seattle, I was pleased and surprised to see Exbiblio starting to work in a more formal manner, with milestones that had to be crossed built into the system, and progress ticked off each day. Two months ago I was astonished to discover that Exbiblio had only recently hired a part-time bookkeeper – and could only now present its financial position in detail. I had noted the lack of a finance director but I had wrongly assumed that there was somebody I hadn’t met yet keeping a close eye on every last figure and doing financial projections.
I think that part of what’s happened is that the real picture has started to appear out of the mist. In the new spirit of ‘formal discipline” it has become much clearer just what an enormous undertaking Exbiblio has made, how far away it is from completion, how little room there is for setbacks, and how much it is likely to cost.
I put this point of view to Martin. He doesn’t deny it. Perhaps he is feeling a little low, because normally he is more combative when I put forward my views. However, I have a strong feeling that this is a big part of the truth.
I don’t think Martin made these mistakes unawares. He is experienced in business and knows how things are normally done. He has been – and to an extent still is – determined to do things his own way. The cost of the experiment so far has been high with precious little to show for it. I will be interested to see how conventional or unconventional Exbiblio will be in its coming phase of ‘retrenchment”.
November 27th, 2006 at 11:44 am
From my outsider point of view it seems the choice comes down to one of two extremes, because to stay in-between would amount to a halfhearted effort:
1. Cut the losses. If this is as good as it gets and nothing lies ahead, let’s be honest and gentle and honorable about it.
2. Double up. If the vision is right, if the end-point is clear but the road to travel longer and more difficult than first thought, plan anew, recommit and re-fund over a new plan.
Digressing a bit if I may, sometimes one gets discouraged when looking at the road ahead, forgetting to look back to realize how much path has already been covered. Martin and the Team have objectively reflected about the value of the tangible and intangible assets been built over the past few months: How far in development are the oPen hardware and software? How to value the effort spent in them? Does ExBB have an advantage born out of these many months thinking about product design, customer needs, etc? If someone started anew, how much effort (money, man-hours, skills, etc.) would it take them?
The funds used until now should not be taken into consideration for this new decision since they have already been used (and whatever the outcome they are now a sunk cost). Then the question becomes: With what has been built plus what is aimed for, are they reason enough to commit more funds? How to plan and execute it differently? What would be needed? Is the return seek appropriate to the level of new risk to bear? Can the game be played out differently? For example, which organizations out there are ExBB natural complementor’s and so, could share the returns and the risks of the new phase?
I suppose that the valuation of these and many more questions that I don’t fathom, lie behind the decision made. The retrenchment being the way to regroup and reanalyze prior to alternative number 2.
Many of the great companies of today were ultimately made in these circumstances, at a crossroad decision in a time of difficulty and change. A cold head must prevail since we can only know of the successful ones, (since the failed ones and the risks not taken don’t make it to the Business Week cover). But, if the vision is right, intelligent perseverance is the way to go. Plus, I would love to see ExBiblio succeed.